As is only to be expected, most of the comment-responses that this blog gets are abusive and indignant protests from offended and touchy Hindus, whose irrationalities of religion and metaphysics are the staple and target of this blog's critical swipes.
What draws the irate anger of the offended Hindu is any criticism or ridicule of the scriptures. Especially such people are very sensitive to any criticism of the Upanishads and the Gita. So this critical attack on the Ch. Upanishad was not taken lying down by a commenter/abuser Venkat C.
I tried to engage him in refuting his defenses and chasing him on this deflections and shifting of topics and goal-posts. I would recommend readers to go thru the comment-trail of that post to get an idea of vanities and delusions that the religious harbor about their 'cherished' Upanishads.
But the latest comment on that article from this dogged defender of Vedantic dogma is like upping the ante of abuse by resorting to hysterical tone as this comment of his below will show:
Ranganath,
You are heights of hypocrisy. Go back and your comments, you will understand whether or not you have personally attacked me. Any ways, I am not going to cry like you do.
I have referred the very same links that you have sent me when I was kid. I have attempted to study with two elderly Sanskrit teachers who lived in my street. It took us very little time to conclude that we wouldn't understand any thing from those translations. Neither me nor any one would believe that a person like you would understand anything from these translations.
I remember you making a rude statement that "Vedas are wish fulfilling Voodoo. They are wish fulfilling, but how do you know that it is "Voodoo"? I am curious to know. Which part of these translations that you have sent made you make that stupid statement? Can you provide the numbers?
Let me educate you little bit here Son. Each veda has four parts. They are Mantras (I bet some one like you would understand ABSOLUTELY NOTHING from them), Brahmanas, Aranyakas and Upanishads. It is pretty clear now that you have been referring to Mantras alone. Aren't you ashamed of making so many statements, you have written big pile of trash here without have any knowledge of Vedas. Oh my god! You have got heights of insanity!
References to Brahmanas & Aranyakas are available in the sources I gave you. I will provide you exact page numbers for my claims. I am visiting the US and once I go back I will give you those page numbers. I am not an escapist like you are, so Stay tuned, I will surely send them!
You are heights of hypocrisy. Go back and your comments, you will understand whether or not you have personally attacked me. Any ways, I am not going to cry like you do.
I have referred the very same links that you have sent me when I was kid. I have attempted to study with two elderly Sanskrit teachers who lived in my street. It took us very little time to conclude that we wouldn't understand any thing from those translations. Neither me nor any one would believe that a person like you would understand anything from these translations.
I remember you making a rude statement that "Vedas are wish fulfilling Voodoo. They are wish fulfilling, but how do you know that it is "Voodoo"? I am curious to know. Which part of these translations that you have sent made you make that stupid statement? Can you provide the numbers?
Let me educate you little bit here Son. Each veda has four parts. They are Mantras (I bet some one like you would understand ABSOLUTELY NOTHING from them), Brahmanas, Aranyakas and Upanishads. It is pretty clear now that you have been referring to Mantras alone. Aren't you ashamed of making so many statements, you have written big pile of trash here without have any knowledge of Vedas. Oh my god! You have got heights of insanity!
References to Brahmanas & Aranyakas are available in the sources I gave you. I will provide you exact page numbers for my claims. I am visiting the US and once I go back I will give you those page numbers. I am not an escapist like you are, so Stay tuned, I will surely send them!
I have highlighted in bold the more or most hysterical parts of this commenter's abuse as they provide an interesting observation on how indignant protestors begin to lose their composure and stoop to almost hysterical shrieking when their antics are responded to with counter arguments and refutations. And how the commenter has no realization or recognition of his own hysterical abusive tone.
While it would be interesting to respond to this kind of hysterics and enumerate its fallacies and over-the-top nonsense, I will attempt that in a subsequent post.
Readers can meanwhile 'savor' the taste of this specimen of 'Hindutva Hysterics'
I wonder if it is you, Ranganath who is losing patience and I must call you a specimen of anti Hindu hysteria. See, how defensive you get by putting out somebody's response on a fresh blog. Shame on you!
ReplyDelete